Doctor Who complete reviews: The Girl in the Fireplace
| REVIEWS - DOCTOR WHO |
John takes the road-less-travelled in regards to this popular Tennant outing...

Put ten people in the same room and get them to agree on every viewpoint in the world – it just cannot be done. Let's say they're debating about all-time great pop songs: While the majority of the group will praise a so-called revered classic like 'Hey Jude' by The Beatles or 'Tiny Dancer' by Elton John, there will always be one who can't see the appeal.
In this case, that'd be me then – I think of them both as tedious, overlong, funereal dirges: One sounds like Macca's got his extremities caught in the jaws of a crocodile, the other sounds like it was recorded from the bottom of a wishing well. But inexplicably, it seems that at least 99.9% of the population regard these as musical behemoths.
Same goes for Doctor Who. Name a classic story like City Of Death, The Talons Of Weng-Chiang and The Caves Of Androzani and inevitably, most of the fans will praise them until they are blue in the face. Now I'm not going to disagree with the superlatives for these three brilliant adventures – but one story's acclaim that does slightly baffle me is The Girl In The Fireplace.
You know, The Girl In The Fireplace. The story in which The Doctor meets Madame De Pompadour, the mistress of King Louis XV, and falls in lurve with her – only for his heart to be broken at the end. The episode has been lauded to the heavens by the fans and won a Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation in 2007.
And yet. I'm just left shrugging my shoulders and going “So what?” Wow, talk about not getting an invite to the party.
So what's my beef with The Girl In The Fireplace? Don't get me wrong, there are some aspects of the story that merit applause. It's one of the best looking episodes of the season. The setting of 18th century France is like a gift from the gods to the BBC, since they can recreate historical dramas in their sleep. Sure enough, The Girl In The Fireplace is no exception – the set designs are beautiful and convey that sense of grandeur and luxury perfectly. Not only that, but the costumes and props are just as well realised and just show how much attention to detail has been paid by the cream of creative talent around.
"The clockwork androids are a masterpiece of design, so it's just a shame that as the monsters of the piece, they're a bit wasted"
I also like the appearance of the clockwork androids – they're again, immaculately designed, and like all memorable Doctor Who monsters, have that blank-faced terror working for them. It's the same sort of deal as the Autons – there's no expression of human emotion. Instead, we just get this permanent fixed harlequin grin, a bit like clowns at a circus. They're a masterpiece of design, so it's just a shame that as the monsters of the piece, they're a bit wasted – but read on.
The story's also a good showcase for Euros Lyn, who's already proving to be one of the most adaptable directors in Doctor Who. From monster menagerie through to Christmassy romp through to gothic horror and now through to this. Lyn directs the story with flair, wit and imagination, and counterpoints the humming spaceship very well with the regal splendour of 18th century France.
The regulars get some good material too. Interestingly, Rose doesn't seem to mind too much that Mickey's come on board the TARDIS – apparently, Steven Moffat had written the episode without reading the conclusion of School Reunion, when Rose had reacted to Mickey's initiation with a snort of disgust. Luckily, the two work well in this story, and there's a good double act going on between Noel Clarke and Billie Piper. “Now you're getting it!” she grins, as the two disregard The Doctor's orders to stay put. It's also amusing to see Mickey tease Rose with The Doctor's latest conquests (“So that Doctor, eh? Madame De Pompadour... Sarah Jane Smith... Cleopatra...”), only for Rose to start to get a bit huffy. This does lead to a big problem with The Girl In The Fireplace (more on this later), but fortunately, both Clarke and Piper are infectiously enjoyable.
"The production team are seemingly hell-bent on making this incarnation into a squealing hybrid of Timmy Mallett and Joe Pasquale"
It's also a strong one for David Tennant, despite the somewhat dubious character of the Tenth Doctor in this story. By now, Tennant had got the hang of his Doctor, and manages the right mix of goofy humour, action hero and romantic lead. He's very good with the deadpan humour and makes the most of his witty lines (“Mickey, what's a pre-Revolutionary France doing on board a spaceship? Get a little perspective!”). By contrast, he's also good with the more serious stuff, and adds a lot of poignancy to those last few scenes. His forlorn expression as he tucks Reinette's last letter away tells you everything you need to know about The Doctor's state of mind, and it really emphasises his oft-quoted loneliness.
But here's the thing – the character of the Tenth Doctor isn't that sympathetic in The Girl In The Fireplace. Superficially, we have the awful scene in which he pretends to be drunk – yes, we know he's only pretending, but it's another example of how the production team are seemingly hell-bent on making this incarnation into a squealing hybrid of Timmy Mallett and Joe Pasquale. Kudos to Tennant for actually making the best of this clunky scene, but the infantile goofing is really starting to try the patience.
On a slightly more worrying level is the fact that The Doctor's apparently prepared to abandon Rose and Mickey forever while he chinks glasses with Reinette. OK, so he saves Reinette from the clockwork androids, but at the cost of leaving Rose and Mickey to either mooch about on an abandoned spaceship or in the TARDIS forever. Bet they'll love that when they're out of food, bored with the TARDIS swimming pools and contemplating cannibalism.
And when it comes to the whole Doctor 4 Rose arc, The Girl In The Fireplace is like fitting a square peg in a round hole. It just seems like yesterday that the Ninth Doctor was telling Rose that she's “Fantastic!” Now, poor old Rose has been shoved aside for Reinette. Granted, Reinette's got a lot more on her CV than Rose – she's an actress, artist, musician, dancer, courtesan and excellent gardener (I can't really see Rose queuing up to be the next Carol Klein somehow), but this never really squares with his feelings for Rose, especially since next season, he'll be lamenting her departure on a seemingly non-stop basis. So, again, abandoning Rose for Reinette makes The Doctor just seem like a heartless prick.
And whisper it... The Doctor “dances” with Reinette. Yes, only at his second story for Doctor Who is Moffat smugly self-referencing his previous work of art. Actually, the whole “dancing” thing doesn't bother me – that said though, I can see why some fans might lament the fact that their hero has just become your average wise-cracking one-man shagging machine who's gone from being a timeless alien to an intergalactic James Bond.
Still, as Rose starts blubbing into her fire extinguisher, at least she can console herself with the fact that she can speak properly. Reinette, on the other hand, is saddled with this terrible, clunky dialogue that alternates between saccharine and gobbledegook. Take the nonsense when she's talking with Rose about how the days of her life are “pressed together like the chapters of a book” on a vessel, before bleating: “While I, weary traveller, must always take the slower path”. The opening “The clock on the mantel is broken! It is time!” line is also a bit of a howler. I feel sorry for Sophia Myles actually – she's a fine actress, but she's saddled with so many garbled, cheesy lines that she looks deeply uncomfortable. It's a worthy bid by Moffat to create authentic period dialogue, but it all sounds terribly false and unreal. Maybe, more naturalistic dialogue would have been the way to go.
Another problem with Moffat's writing is that it does border on smug at times. Just look at River Song, a walking, talking smug dispenser. And then we have the odd line in The Girl In The Fireplace. Don't get me wrong, there's stacks of brilliantly witty lines abound in The Girl In The Fireplace – too many to mention, but I'll narrow it down to three: “I mean this from the heart – and by the way, count those...”, “I'm not winding you up” or “We do not require your feet”. Even with this startling parade of wit, unfortunately one or two of Moffat's lines are too glib by half – the “I'm The Doctor and I just snogged Madame De Pompadour!” is cringe-inducing, while the “You're Mr Thick Thick Thickety Thick Face from Thicktown, Thickania” is the sort of cut-price Rimmer-speak that Grant and Naylor would have crumpled up and chucked in the nearest waste paper bin.
"Moffat's script contains much wit and poetry, but it's hampered by way too many problems for my liking"
Going back to the clockwork soldiers, they're a classic example of how Moffat sometimes attempts to rely on making a monster scary through looks alone. It's the same sort of deal with the Smilers in The Beast Below. They look freaky for the kids, but they don't actually do anything. And likewise, the clockwork soldiers never really get to do anything apart from stomp around slowly while holding up razor blades. In Moffat's defence, we do get to hear of their handiwork in a deliciously horrible description – the crew of the deserted spaceship have been sliced up, cooked and used for repairs (“Barbecue,” muses The Doctor, grimly). But we never get to see any hint of violence on-screen – back in the day, the Autons shot people, the Mummies throttled their victims – heck, even the Borad aged his whimpering lackeys to skeletons on strings in the blink of an eye. But Moffat never really likes to opt for this approach, which is odd when you consider that kids actually like being scared. I guess the BBC guidelines are just too strong these days...
So when it comes down to it, I'm guessing that my whole “Meh” approach to The Girl In The Fireplace is a result of the rather patchy script. Yes, it has countless good lines, funny moments and a brilliantly wacky (if rather odd) premise. But then you get the less-than-flattering treatment of The Doctor, clunky attempts at 18th century language, one or two incidents of smug mode, and a distinct lack of scares.
And then there's the ending. In my last inane burblings about School Reunion, I noted how that story's ending was genuinely moving – The Girl In The Fireplace attempts the same trick, and this time around, I reacted with the emotion of Spock watching Watership Down.
Yes, on the surface it's rather sad – Reinette dies. Doctor misses the chance of seeing the stars with his new love. Boo hoo. The problem however is that The Girl In The Fireplace follows School Reunion. By that I mean, there's a key difference – School Reunion's a tear-jerker because The Doctor's relationship with Sarah Jane covers several years. She's one of his closest companions. By contrast, he's known Reinette for – ooh, what? A couple of hours?
While Reinette has invested much of her own adult life with the mysterious fireplace man, The Doctor's just been dipping in and out of her life at various intervals like a walking bus. I can't assume that The Doctor's been spending much more time with Reinette – nothing is really made of this in the script, and more to the point, at the end, Reinette says “It's a pity, I think I would have enjoyed the slow path” which suggests that she's only spent fleeting moments in the Time Lord's company.
So as a result, that supposedly tear-jerker last scene never really grabs me. OK, it does emphasise how The Doctor is this so-called “lonely angel” (ugh), but because he's spent so little time in the company of Reinette, the ending just comes across to me as a bit hollow and forced. I can understand why some fans find this final scene deeply moving – and David Tennant really helps sell it – but for me personally, it's just a bit too misplaced.
The Girl In The Fireplace wins out for me in its visuals, direction (even Murray Gold delivers a good score here) and performances from the regulars. Moffat's script contains much wit and poetry, but it's hampered by way too many problems for my liking. Luckily, he'd return to form with the stellar Blink and the Library two-parter, but as for The Girl In The Fireplace - I like it, but I don't love it.
John Bensalhia limbered up for this mammoth task with a full four-series review of Blake's 7, and writes professionally and recreationally all over the web. Check out his portfolio of work here.
Check out John's previous Doctor Who review, School Reunion
IF YOU ENJOYED THIS ARTICLE, PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR SITE, AT NO COST WITH ONE CLICK ON THE FACEBOOK 'LIKE' BUTTON BELOW:
If you're interested in writing for Shadowlocked (disc and screening reviews, etc, or just getting some extra coverage for your extraordinary writing talent, get in touch with us.





Comments
Very much agreed that, almost hilariously, it completely shoves all of this 'One True Love' stuff with Rose right out the window. Not what I'd call a bad thing, heh, but funny to see.
I like The Girl in the Fireplace, but I don't love it.
Moffat actually says in the audio commentary with Noel Clarke (last month's DWM quotes this) that the dancing was just ... dancing. Here's the transcript from the GITF audio commentary on the BBC website (I find it interesting):
Steven Moffat: Yes, he’s off to dance. Now some people might think...
Noel Clarke: The horizontal foxtrot?
Steven Moffat: You know, actually, I don’t think. I’m the writer, I can say this. That’s the night of the Yew Tree ball, and Madame de Pompadour was actually, for all that she’s one of history’s most famous courtesans—look it up kids!—she was quite cold. She wouldn’t be that quick. I think what happened that night is he had the best night of his life at a party with, you know, flirting with Reinette, dancing with Reinette, talking to Reinette, and just thinking she was wonderful. And you’re about to see the after effects of The Doctor of having had the best night at a dance he’s ever had.
Noel Clarke. Okay. Because people have wondered if “dancing” was a euphemism for ...
Steven Moffat: Well, I think it is. And in Doctor Who terms, also, she’s seen inside his head, she knows that he would use it in those terms. So she’s flirting with him. She clearly wouldn’t slap him in the face if he kissed her.
Noel Clarke: Of course not.
Even before having the benefit of the hindsight provided by S5 & 6 (so far) I said that this was one of those episodes where I could SEE that it has a lot going for it, but that I didn't FEEL it. And for me that's a big factor in the sort of drama I like. I like the characters to behave as those characters SHOULD, and not just because the plot says so.
Also, that The Doctor is quite capable of being French - caring deeply for two women at the same time.
Finally, he didn't abandon Rose so much as risk everything to save Reinette. Reinette was about to be decapitated, and Rose and Mickey were (relatively) safe with the TARDIS at hand. He may well have come up with some other way to reunite with his companions (Blink-fashion perhaps) if he couldn't get the "magic door" working again.
My 5c.
While it does reinforce The Doctor's loneliness, as all his human friends WILL die, I think that's really not the main point.