9 potential new epochs for the Assassin's Creed franchise
| LISTS - VIDEOGAME LISTS |
Where should the gaming phenomenon go when Rome is in its wake...?

For a franchise that started with a buggy, premature release and gameplay that was shockingly repetitive and monotonous, Assassin’s Creed has come a very long way indeed. Assassin’s Creed 2 improved exponentially upon the first, giving us the game we had all hoped for the first time around but disappointingly never got. The shift to Renaissance Italy breathed new life into a series that was already in serious danger of becoming stagnant and yet another failed concept. In fact, this shift was so successful that we got a fully-fledged spin-off sequel to enjoy by way of Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood. Conversely, while essentially providing more of the same (no bad thing), Brotherhood also introduced a few key new elements: the Assassins' guild, more set-pieces through Da Vinci’s mechanical wonders, and of course, multiplayer.
As successful and loved as AC2 and Brotherhood protagonist Ezio is, his story is not one that can go on forever. The true protagonist of the series is Desmond, who – compared with Ezio - lacks charisma and charm; but Ubisoft certainly have time to help alter this in AC's future sequels. Indeed, back in 2009 producer Sebastian Puel claimed they could make 35 games without breaking a sweat. Bold words, to be sure, but with the mythology of Assassin’s Creed taking place across hundreds of years, there’s no reason for his claim not to be true.
However, the real question that needs to be addressed is this - where and when will they go next? Interestingly, certain Ubisoft workers have been quoted as saying that fans looking for hints as to the location of the next game in the franchise should look to the comics, which feature the USSR and ancient Rome. Yet, with AC's latest release – Brotherhood – having been set almost entirely in Borgia Rome, it’s difficult to imagine Ubisoft producing yet another game in the same setting, and it’s almost certainly something the fans would be up in arms about.
Instead, what’s widely expected and, generally speaking, most wanted, is for Ubisoft to head in an entirely different direction with new locations, new characters, and new set-pieces. Here’s a list of just some of the possibilities Ubisoft could pursue in future Assassin’s Creed games.
1: Restoration, Tudor, and Victorian London
London is a city rife with history. There are literally hundreds of possibilities here. Ubisoft could explore Elizabethan England, the Civil War, the Restoration, and so on. The Elizabethan era – or the Golden Age – probably serves as the best backdrop, featuring England at a time of heavy change, with its first female monarch and serious political alliances taking place behind the scenes. Given Assassin’s Creed’s tendency to feature characters that played crucial roles in history, it’s quite easy to imagine Sir Francis Drake, both Thomas and Oliver Cromwell, Samuel Pyps or even Isaac Newton popping up to rival AC2 and ACB’s Leonardo da Vinci and Machiavelli. The specific time setting of the game almost certainly means only one of these historic figures could appear without creating a serious time paradox, but even one of them would be a logical and excellent addition to the franchise.
2: Feudal Japan
This one almost speaks for itself. The ninja and the assassin may be different clans, but they’re practically kissing cousins. In fact, bringing in ninjas could really work in the franchise’s favour if Ubisoft were seeking to expand upon the stealth aspect of the franchise, something many fans, myself included, feel they could improve upon exponentially. Not since the days of the PS One has there been a decent ninja stealth-orientated game by way of Tenchu and Tenchu: Birth of the Assassins (sorry for current franchise fans, but the series has been in progressive decline since the PS2 games), and Ubisoft have a huge chance to break into that sorely-lacking market.
Ninjas aren’t all historical Japan has to offer, though; in the time before Ieyasu unified the Feudal Lords, there was plenty of division and struggle among the different factions, not to mention the Samurai, the introduction of gaijin and the modernization of Japan. Sounds like the perfect backdrop for an Assassin’s Creed storyline.
3: Revolutionary France
This one has been hotly rumored as the setting for the next big location change in the franchise, and it's easy to see why. Some would even make an argument that democracy was born in France. With Marie Antoinette’s infamous “Let them eat cake” cementing the royal family’s doom, the architecture of France was changed forever; followed by the subsequent execution of King Louis XVI, ala guillotine, in 1793. Ten years later, Napolean would be leading France in battle against England and other European nations. As for who would step into the 'genius' slot, the Marquis de Sade was still around at that time…
4: Romanov Russia / The Soviet Union
Not long before the Bolsheviks and Menshaviks finished their bloody battle for what was then called Petrograd (now St. Petersberg), Tsar Nicholas the Second was still in power and a mysterious monk named Grigori Rasputin emerged and rose through the Royal Family’s inner circle until he had the Tsar’s ear. Having allegedly healed the Tsar’s son of hemophilia B, Rasputin had garnered himself a reputation as the 'Mad Monk'. When he was finally assassinated by Prince Felix Yusupov, the Tsarist government came to an abrupt, bloody end less than a year later. Apparently unaffected by a dose of poison large enough to kill five men, Rasputin is said to have then survived four gunshot wounds, only finally dying by drowning in the Moika river where his body was dumped. A figure shrouded in mystery to this day, Rasputin’s mysticism could be brilliantly explained by his use of one of the Pieces of Eden found throughout the Creed universe.
5: Independent America
The time of the Founding Fathers is one of the most influential in all history, and it’s also one of the closest to our own. Although ballsy, Ubisoft could potentially pit a newly-declared American citizen against the tyranny of the British Colonials during the War of Independence. This would provide hugely ambitious but extremely tantalizing opportunities to encounter some of the most iconic American figures of all time, including George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and many more. Although still a young nation, America has a great deal of history already. Other possibilities include the Civil War and the Gold Rush, though Ubisoft then potentially run the risk of treading on Red Dead Redemption’s toes.
6: Ancient Civilizations
This is a very broad submission, and while each are different in their own way, the Incas, Mayans, Aztecs and Egyptians are all ancient civilizations about which we know a sizeable amount, but still have gaping holes in our knowledge of their respective cultures. The Egyptians may be the best example of this, particularly with the Pyramids. We still don’t know exactly how they were built, and with the Pieces of Eden, Ubisoft have a fantastically convenient way of answering this.
7: Nazi Germany
Another time-period heavily rumoured to feature in the next game, Nazi Germany certainly has the potential to fit in with the Creed universe. Hitler was widely known to be a collector of rare antiquities, as well as of religious artifacts. Again, this fits perfectly with the Pieces of Eden mythology and once again could take place at a time of great social change. Of course, it’s highly unlikely that Ubisoft would have you controlling a Nazi character – more likely we’d control a British or American spy relaying their information back home. In the time of the Third Reich, it’s hard to imagine any protagonist brandishing two dual-hidden blades up their sleeves when they could simply use a pistol. This would therefore most likely result in an evolution of the weapon system, and as long as Ubisoft didn’t simply turn the game into a GTA clone, it’s fairly safe to say the fans would still be satisfied.
8: Imperial China
'Imperial China' covers a broad spectrum of time, so more specifically, let’s say during the Qing Dynasty, which was between 1644 and 1912. Admittedly, I can’t profess to know a great deal about Chinese history, but even an unimaginative mind can grasp the possibilities of a China where martial arts rule. Anyone who’s ever seen the movies Hero or Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon can easily imagine the rooftop scrambling that China could potentially bring, not to mention China’s culturally rich locales, including the Great Wall. The only problem here is that China might be just a little too vast.
9: Modern Day New York
Well, this is basically what we’ve been building towards. Since day one, we’ve known that the true main character in this story is Desmond, a despondently apathetic twenty-something who seems to have no earthly connections, friends, or family. In fact, the only thing we actually know about Desmond is he works as a barman. Wow. Compelling stuff. At the moment, Desmond doesn’t so much pale in comparison to his ancestors (even Altair had his moments) as just fail to compare at all. If Ubisoft are serious about bringing Desmond to the forefront of the franchise as our main protagonist, they need to heavily invest in his character-building. Apparently building up to the end of the world in 2012, Desmond’s storyline needs to get its act together soon if the fans are going to care enough to want to play as him over Ezio or another of his ancestors. Not only that, but if Ubisoft brought the gameplay to modern times – as they seem to have been building towards since Creed’s inception – would we be switching hidden blades for dual-glocks? It’s difficult to imagine Creed retaining its atmosphere and unique gameplay mechanics if the modern day is brought into the equation, and potentially threatens to turn Assassin’s Creed into just another Grand Theft Auto wannabe.
Of course, not all of these storylines could so easily fit into the larger story of Assassins versus Templars, particularly in the regions of Asia, but it’s worth noting that creating a side-story in order to explore these locales as an assassin would not make a jot of difference to Ubisoft’s sales – Templars or no, nobody is going to pass up the opportunity to go ninja in order to maintain storyline continuity. There’s also the question of Desmond’s lineage – if jumping from Jerusalem to Renaissance Italy wasn’t a big enough shift for Desmond’s varied heritage, giving him an Asian ancestor might be pushing the boundaries of belief. Nonetheless, after hundreds of years of changing family locales, who’s to say that Desmond couldn’t have any Japanese, Chinese or Russian in him? And if that’s going too far, just introduce another character – it’s been established through AC2 and ACB that there are other teams of Assassins out there in the modern day doing the same thing as Des and co – a spin-off game would give us a great opportunity to expand the AC horizons.
So, what say you kids? Which of the above locations would you like to see AC go to next? How many games would you play before you got bored of the same formula? Are you eager for the modern-day setting or hoping it never comes? Do you have any suggestions of your own? Sound off the in the comments below and get your voice heard!
By the same author:
Could 'Mass Effect' be the first worthwhile videogame adaptation?
IF YOU ENJOYED THIS ARTICLE, PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR SITE, AT NO COST WITH ONE CLICK ON THE FACEBOOK 'LIKE' BUTTON BELOW:
If you're interested in writing for Shadowlocked (disc and screening reviews, etc, or just getting some extra coverage for your extraordinary writing talent, get in touch with us.




Comments
1.) It gives a more interesting/exiting view of the story
2.) There's so much more you can do, to branch off of the end of AC brotherhood. To find the other "temples" the Godesses mentioned in AC 2 & AC brotherhood. ( who knows?! Maybe one of the temples could maybe be in NYC, hidden secretly or something, or maybe not just NYC).
3.) It gives a chance for Desmond to come in contact with the other assassin's that are working out there in the real world(reality/Modern day). So maybe he could lead them, like his ancestors altiar and Ezio did. To fight against Warren Vidict and the Templar assassin's (that Vidict has been training, to later, take on the modern day assassins) at an equal level this time.
I just though I would share this with you guys. What do you think? If you have Any questions or ideas, or even other reasons, contact me.
3.)
On the other hand however, the modern day one (although it sounds cool) will probably be such a big leap it won't feel like AC anymore.
The compromise for me, would be Victorian London because the narrow, dark streets provide an awesome opportunity for creating atmosphere, even throwing in some more horror-ish elements. There are also several famous real and fictional characters that can be played off to add the historical tradition the series has built up.
As for the concepts 1,3,4, and 5, seem more plausible and better eras to set the game in. Then there is the whole "Ancient Civilizations", just doesn't really seem like a great idea unless they were just giving more background to the whole "Pieces of Eden".
If you want possible ancestral links to Asia, specifically Italian ones since one doesn't want to "push the boundaries of belief" too much, look no further than Marco Polo or Giovanni da Pian del Carpine, who both traveled to the Mongol Empire long before the time of Ezio.
These Get My Pick For The Culture And I Think That Running Around These Places Would Make Great Gameplay And There Is Plenty Of History
same venues, not working for me
To bring it to the future would almost be a mistake in my opinion! I play Assassin's Creed to see settings that are rarely, if not never, seen in games before!
When I played AC1 for the first time, the atmosphere of the 12th century was amazing! When in Acre, I felt like I was in a plague ridden city that was dark and corrupt. Beautiful!
Same with AC2! Aside from the dark city of Forli, the cities were beautiful and extravagant!
Rome was decent, but too friendly feeling. I didn't feel like an outsider like you do in AC1 or AC2. But the story was alright.
Anyways! Yeah! London would be amazing! Although I wish there was more connectivity with citizen AI in the game. I feel like in AC games, there's still a separation from your character and the whole crowd. I'm not sure how Ubisoft could change that, but we'll see!
Also, I wish Eagle Vision was different and that finding objectives were slightly a task instead of just running to them! It'd be cool if you got info on where you were needed to go and once you got there, you use observational skills to start missions (you see someone get attacked, i dunno...) or find whoever you are looking for (instead of a guy just standing there in a big white column.) I understand that we're "in an animus", but being inside an animus shouldn't take away all the difficulty. I actually read that ubisoft wasn't planning to have a compass in the first game, which would have been sweet because you'd actually have to listen to the Info Guy before starting your mission.
ANYWAYS! I hope Ubisoft makes the RIGHT choice and takes their time with this game (AS IN TWO YEARS LIKE A NORMAL GAME).
Brotherhood was good, but it felt sloppily put together and I know its because they wanted their multiplayer out and just for money. I really hope they don't start milking the series. It'll probably ruin it. Seriously though, a new engine/set up would be nice! And less pop-in. :(
And Max has a good point! They probably can shove London and Paris in the same game if they really wanted. Although I think having firearms takes away from the stealth BIG TIME!
I have so many little things to point out. But all-in-all, I do love this game series and understand that an open-world takes up a lot of space. But I really feel like AC isn't the sandbox game it can be. Maybe if it was like an MMO and there were clans in a city? Not sure. And don't get mad or anything for saying that. I'm not some MMO fan or anything, I actually never played any before. Just a thought.
Well, that's my two cents worth! Can't wait for the next game Ubisoft!
And he can use it aganst vidic. A friend of mine even thinks Desmond is altiar that the apple made altiar immortal and every century he forgets everything and has to get new memorys. Kinda absurd but not impossible.
But I love Japan. It's an amazing culture. I would love to see a good game here - and Assassin's creed Is always a good game. The only proplem I foresee is that I don't think they made really tall buildings in Japan until recently... Except the palaces - but I'm pretty sure they were a minority. But perhaps there would be a way around that...
Ich werde niemals genug von der Vielfalt von Assassins creed bekommen. Da ich mich nur schwer entscheiden konnte hier meine Favoriten: London, Frankreich, Alte Völker (Maya, Inka, Ägypten) und Nazi Deutschland. All diese Geschehnisse waren absolut prägend (ok, das waren ausnahmslos eh alle, aber man muss sich ja auch mal entscheiden) Mir juckt es jetzt schon in den Fingern, ganz egal welche Epoche es wird.
Aber, was ich so gern im nächsten Teil hätte, wäre die Chance, die Story im 2 Player Modus zu absolvieren. Mit einem verbündeten Assassinen, vielleicht aus dem geschichtlichen Hintergrund von Lucy?! Würde auch Sinn ergeben. Oder die Option online im 2 Player Modus zu spielen (wie z.B. bei Resident Evil 5)
Ich denke, die Idee mit der Gegenwart lässt sich jederzeit in zukünftige AC Teile einbauen. Desmond braucht definitiv auch ein paar Aufgaben, aber meiner Meinung nach sollte der Sprung in die Vergangenheit IMMER dabei sein. Dass heißt: Eine Fortsetzung ALLEIN in der Gegenwart würde meiner Meinung nach die Seele von AC zerstören! Aber ich habe volles Vertrauen in euch. Ihr wisst am Besten, worauf es ankommt. Dafür lieben wir euch!
Option 1: London - This option would work well for the AC Franchise, I feel. Given the slew of information available, plus the mixture of intrigue and mystery surrounding various individuals, this could work out well. My only concern is the foolish cheering section for Jack the Ripper and Steampunk. NO. STEAMPUNK.
Option 2: Feudal Japan - While we know that there have existed Japanese Assassins (quite likely linked to the Ninja directly), this would not work for Desmond's story. This is not to say that there could not be a good AC story in Japan; it just would not work for Desmond's ancestry. It would make a good side story or a new assassin, but not Desmond.
Option 3: Revolution France - I feel this would make a great addition to the AC franchise, especially for Desmond's line; it would work for his progression, plus the cast of characters would make a great story. I can already see the assassin breaking into the Bastille. However, I do have concern over when it would focus: Marie Antoinette time or Napoleon? Having both would overstretch the time frame.
Option 4: Russia - Since the side comic The Fall is already covering part of Russia, I feel no need for this to be a part of the Desmond line unless it is either one of his last ancestors OR Desmond visits multiple locations throughout the world in an effort to gather the other pieces.
Option 5: ~1776 America - This concerns me for two reasons:one, most of the founding father were Freemasons, who historically have closer ties to Templar than the Assassins. Two, the prevalence of guns and open warfare would have to play out more akin to the Project Legacy Christmas piece in WWI. Furthermore, there simply weren't enough deaths of key figures in this time to make a good story, unless they WERE killed and replaced with look-alikes.
Option 6: Ancient Civ. - NO. Just NO. This would deal too openly with The Ones who Came Before, so an Animus option simply wouldn't work, given Altair was their first Assassin. This would only work in regards to the method I mentioned back up in Russia; Desmond traveling to these locales. Not to say this wouldn't make a great ENDING, but it would not work for anything else.
Option 7: Nazi Germany - Again, NO. Those who recall from the Subject 16 pieces, it was already mentioned that Hitler was defeated and a POE was taken from there. It did not say WHO took it, IIRC, but it was already mentioned in passing, and therefore is unlikely to happen. Also, that much gun-fare is a BIG no-no for the AC line.
Option 8: Imperial China - I am discrediting this as an option for similar reasons as Japan. There is simply not enough bloodline option. I do have other reasons, however. I agree with the Article that China may be too vast, and that the Great Wall would be a great location. HOWEVER, the article also states the timeline would be to vast in any one period, and martial arts may be a bit too out there for the AC line, which functions more like Parkour than Kung Fu.
Option 9: Modern Day NYC - I am concerned with the prevalence of firearms, and worried there would be too much gunkata for this story. NYC would only work if this is Desmond's episode, like the article said, but as far as being a midpoint, it is far too late into the future/present to work well.
I agree that many of these would make for goo side stories or full stories for another assassin, but we must remember that it is DESMOND we are also focusing on, not just his ancestors. I do feel that the best leap next would be something in the late 1700s, seeing how we have begun in late 1100s, followed by late 1400s into early 1500s.
I have many further opinions regarding the story options for the future of the franchise, as well as the options regarding the ones proposed in the article, but given how I basically wrote my own article here, I'd rather not overstay my welcome any further.
Anal much??
Attribution
The quotation, as attributed to Marie Antoinette, was claimed to have been uttered during one of the famines that occurred in France during the reign of her husband Louis XVI. Upon being alerted that the people were suffering due to widespread bread shortages, the Queen is said to have replied, "Then let them eat brioche."[4] Although the phrase was seldom cited by opponents of the monarchy at the time of the French Revolution, it did acquire great symbolic importance in subsequent histories when pro-revolutionary historians sought to demonstrate the obliviousness and selfishness of the French upper-classes at that time. As one biographer of the Queen notes, it was a particularly useful phrase to cite because "the staple food of the French peasantry and the working class was bread, absorbing 50 per cent of their income, as opposed to 5 per cent on fuel; the whole topic of bread was therefore the result of obsessional national interest."[5]
However, there is no evidence that Queen Marie-Antoinette ever uttered this phrase and substantial evidence that she did not. Objections to the legend of Marie-Antoinette and the cake/brioche centre on arguments concerning the real queen's personality, internal evidence from members of the French royal family, the date of the saying's origin and its frequent citation in works pre-dating Marie-Antoinette's life. For example, the Queen's best-selling English-language biographer, Lady Antonia Fraser, wrote in 2002:
"[Let them eat cake] was said 100 years before her by Marie-Thérèse, the wife of Louis XIV. It was a callous and ignorant statement and she, Marie Antoinette, was neither."[6]
Author Vincent Cronin also agrees that Marie-Thérese made the statement, and not Marie Antoinette.[7]
Perhas I should've made myself clearer. I'm not saying she did say it, the point is, EVERYONE in France believed she did - and that certainly did cement her fate.
With how the first AC introduced Desmond to both bladed weapons and thrown weapons (throwing knives) the next logical procession was in ACII with the throwing knives and da Vinchi's hidden gun. And then in ACB with the gun, throwing knives and cross bow. its all leading up to teaching Desmond how to fight with today's weapons.
They should definatly concentrate more on Desmond and his story. Maybe have a small thing in the past because of how the end of ACB ended and by now I'm sure all of us knows how that ended. The next logical step should be Desmonds generation. We have to find out where the temples are and we only have so much time to do it.
As for some peoples claims that bringing modern weapons into the game well its still the same we would only have access to certain weapons as the same as the other 3 games. Batons like Abstergo uses, the hidden blade, poison, and knives, are just to name a few off the top of my head. There are many different things you can do without using the guns of modern times. Remember secret organization hiding in the shadows. Wouldn't nessisarily want to draw notice to themselves. As Abstergo wouldn't want to draw attention to themselves.
Weapons stores instead of blacksmiths. Clothing shops instead of tailors. More use of the NPC's to translate for things like making poison and such. The ability to hide would be an assasin's greatest friend and not needing the animus would be a bonus.
In the end of ACB we saw some definate cliffhanger items that make me believe that not only is the next game going to be just as fantastic as we've come to expect but that the next game will be a more Desmond centric game.
They tried hard to make ACB more Desmond centric but I don't agree that it worked as well. to be a more centric character you need to have that character be playable for more that 10-15% of the game more like 90-100 % or the game. We all know that the series is all about Desmond and with the end of ACB the next game can not be anything but.
Abd before anyone screams at me remember this is only my opinion based on my observations. Nothing more nothing less.
Especially Ancient Egypt..We already know that an assassin killed Cleopatra in AC II
Number 6 all the way!! There is so much to work with there.
Egypt and sumerians will be cool!
:)
and a choose number 6! Ancient civilizations!! !
best franchise ever made!!
i agree with others... ALTAIR should be return!!! will be AMAZING!
i think france or london are best.
return of altair would be interesting too or maybe ezios relatives...
Feudal Japan
Naruto as A Assassins
But the ideas I've had already before this list were also in C. Morgan's mind. If I should take a decision, I'd prefer another FEW parts.
Starting up with No 3 as democracy got born into the European World. I estimate this to be a rich process with all the connections and also fights behind the masks between Church and Monarchy longing for the overweight in power. To me it would be the most possible sequel because it was a phase which grew steadily and found its explosion within the Revolution. Nothing else could beat this settlement until that time.
After that the British Empire and its development as well as the Civil War and finally Independent America could be connected chapter like AC2 & Brotherhood. This in front of the idea, that these times followed on the French Revolution as a time where Human learned to cope with this thing called democracy, freedom of being, freedom of speech and where the old structures survived more and more hidden.
How the World evaluated under the Nazi influence would be interesting after that and the Absolute Final should take place in New York.
Whether or not New York, instead several different locations.
Another character (other than Desmond) would just make the next game a type of Assassin's Creed Brotherhood, which is complementary to the series but with a non-absolute ending.
Haven't you heard about all the prizes it won back in 2007-2008? c'mon...
because this... i prefer ancient civilizations... [6]
AC = Holy Land
ACII = Italy, where the Vatican is.
My personal opinion would be revolutionary France. Although there wouldn't be any Eiffel Tower to climb, the Notre Dame could be the main landmark of the city, and also would be ACIIIs answer to the Cathedral of the Holy Cross in AC and the Duomo in ACII.
Plus, if the time period were to go any further during France, the city would be too big to make it standard size, and the entire game would have to take place in one city again. And besides, the AC game's always shrink down their landmarks, so you would probably get disappointed with a scaled down version of the tower.
As for other possible ideas, I would like to see another game with Altair, preferably during the Fourth Crusade in Constantinople. After all, Altair did say he would come to other people's aid should another crusade were to be launched.
As for a modern-era game, I would say no. I don't think cars and automatic guns would fit well in an AC game. Plus, there's a whole bunch of people who don't really like Desmond very much, or at least his side-plot.
Also, for the Ancient Rome setting, that time period was very different from Borgia Rome, so it would also be interesting (and we would see a life-sized Colosseum as well).
True, it won prizes and things, but that is because at the time, the game was revolutionary and a new concept to gamers. But honestly, if you played AC2 first, and went back, as i did, it felt limited and redundant. But I still loved it.
Because of that, Yea i would like to posssibly see another Altair game. One without those problems, and with all that was right in all the AC games so far.
but why would you play the second game and then start on the first? that's pretty stupid