Doctor Who: Matt Smith - the best 'Doctor' since Tom Baker?
| FEATURES - TV |
Martin's convinced that Doctor Who's 'chosen one' has been found after nearly thirty years...

Along with many others, I was worried at 2009's news that season 5 of the new Doctor Who would feature the youngest Doctor ever, in the form of Matt Smith (26 years old at the time of the announcement). Three years younger than Peter Davison when he took up the time-lord's mantle in 1981, it seemed that the BBC had abandoned the character's wisdom and sagacity in favour of floppy emo haircuts and 'youth appeal'.
And yet Smith's take on the trans-dimensional itinerant in series 5 of the series' new iteration - at least so far - has not only gone back to the very roots of classic Who, in my opinion, but is to boot the first Doctor I have really cared about since Tom Baker practically re-defined the character in the 1970s.
This seems harsh on the many intervening talents who took up the role, most particularly David Tennant, and I feel that I should explain before going any further.
Tennant's good looks and extraordinarily thin physique combined with enough considerable comic timing and gravitas to have potentially turned him into one of the best Doctors of the new (or any) era. But in my opinion Tennant was constantly undermined by Russell T. Davies' determination to turn him into a chimera between Christ and Superman, going very much against the grain of forty years of Doctors, who approached their problems (and numerous enemies) more like Sherlock Holmes than Iron Man. These previous Doctors (or at least, the best of them) solved moral quandaries and dilemmas not only in the absence of weaponry (something RTD respected), but with a straightforward dose of superior alien intelligence (something RTD very often disrespected).
You felt they were in danger, and that mattered. With Tennant, it seemed that there was no peril from which his constant self-aggrandisement (as written) could not combine with yet another deus ex machina to extricate him from danger.
David Tennant was undermined further by Davies's determination in the early series of new Who to make the Doctor an almost secondary character to that of his assistant Rose, hooking the show into an EastEnders/soap style market that would broaden it (profitably) beyond its sci-fi roots; an attachment which was so established, and so (in my opinion) over-emphasised in S1-4 that Tennant could not fail to inherit it and incorporate it into his interpretation of the character.
"The Doctor is fundamentally an alien, and too many of the writers and actors who have had a hand in Doctor Who since the reign of Tom Baker seem to have forgotten this fact."
I believe that David Tennant would have been the subject of this article if he had been The Doctor in the reign of Steven Moffat instead of Russell T. Davies, and that in this sense - for all that the role profited him and the new verson of the show garnered viewers - he was short-changed.
In terms of what the character of The Doctor is, fundamentally he is an alien, and too many of the writers and actors who have had a hand in Doctor Who since the reign of Tom Baker seem to have forgotten this fact.
In the 1980s, Baker gave way to the very young Peter Davison, who abandoned Baker's eccentricity for the characteristics of his (admitted, in many interviews) own favourite Doctor, Patrick Troughton. But the young All Creatures Great And Small actor had different qualities to offer than Troughton's pipe-playing eccentric, and his hopes of repeating that particular casting magic disappeared into a consistently aloof performance. The English know all about aloofness - it's not 'alien' to us, and Davison's take on the errant Time Lord consequently struck a frequently unfriendly note.
Davison's successor, Colin Baker, similarly interpreted 'alien' as 'aloof' and even positively 'hostile'. It wasn't until he conspired with fellow actor Nicola Bryant to tone down the written antipathy between The Doctor and assistant Peri (Bryant) in the extended series story Trial Of A Time Lord, that we even saw a glimpse of what this fine actor could have done with the part (and has since done via his audio Doctor Who adventures with Big Finish productions).
Sylvester McCoy's brief reign as the Doctor in the final series of 'classic' Who in the late 1980s saw some hint of the character's genuine eccentricity and curiosity return to the part. The diminutive actor was somewhat hampered by his slight physique, however, which should not have been a factor in a Holmes-inspired sci-fi character, but served to a certain extent to undermine his power in the lee of his more significantly-proportioned predecessors. In any case, the BBC had given up on Doctor Who just on the verge of a new wave of interest in science-fiction, so that was that.
A brief appearance by pseudo-Victorian Doctor Paul McGann in a very American-oriented one-off pilot not only recalled the non-canon movie work of Peter Cushing in the role in the 1960s, but also failed to get the series back off the ground in 1996 (though the actor, like Colin Baker and fellow Withnail And I compadre Richard E. Grant) has since done sterling work in Who audio adventures).
"Of the performance of Christopher Ecclestone in Doctor Who's big 2005 return, what can we say? Alternately gurning and morose, there's no telling what the actor would have done with the role if he had not bailed out after one series"
Of the performance of Christopher Ecclestone in Doctor Who's big 2005 return, what can we say? Alternately gurning and morose, there's no telling what the actor would have done with the role if he had not bailed out after one series - only that rather too much of what he established in new Who S1 arguably ended up informing David Tennant's take on the character in his three-season reign.
Which brings us back to Matt Smith, and what he is doing with the role of the world's favourite time-traveller.
He's doing a lot, and he's clearly on the same page as series producer Steven Moffat in returning the Doctor to where he should be emotionally - wise and yet endlessly curious, trusting and yet curiously naivé.
In this anti-paedophiliac age, there could easily have been a note of discomfort regarding Smith's kitchen conversation with the child version of Amy Pond in The Eleventh Hour, but we instead get a sense that we are dealing with a man of the universe, not of the world. Child-like himself, he's impetuous but without hint of malice or menace - in addition to the (welcome) new sense that he is not invulnerable himself, we feel safe with him. He's full of intellectual pyrotechnics, but they're all there not to impress or embroil, but just because he - in spite of knowing so much - has a thirst to know so much more than he already does.
He likes Amy Pond, and he's lonely enough to want a listening ear and another set of eyes to marvel at the new wonders of the universe with him, but not with the same desperate longing that (in my opinion) weakened David Tennant's take on the character as regards Rose Tyler. Smith's Doctor is clearly an alien, and his pragmatic response to Amy's amorous advances in Flesh And Stone can either be interpreted as the fruit of hard experience or a simple case of mis-matching biologies. Right now, his mind is on higher things - and what could be sexier than that? He's good-looking, brilliant, finally seems to have his temper and ego under some kind of control and is about as eccentric as a box of space-frogs.
I love this Doctor more than any since Tom Baker - and I wasn't expecting to. Oh, Steven, Matt...don't let us down...
See also:
An appraisal of Matt Smith on the eve of Doctor Who season 6
Doctor Who: What made Christopher Eccleston unique
The ten most important characteristics of The Doctor
Doctor Who - a curmudgeon once more?
The Top Ten Doctor Introduction Stories
Picking apart the Doctor Who season six trailer
Doctor Who companions: The Ultimate Tournament
Top 10 Best Doctor Who Series 5 Moments
IF YOU ENJOYED THIS ARTICLE, PLEASE HELP SUPPORT OUR SITE, AT NO COST WITH ONE CLICK ON THE FACEBOOK 'LIKE' BUTTON BELOW:
If you're interested in writing for Shadowlocked (disc and screening reviews, etc, or just getting some extra coverage for your extraordinary writing talent, get in touch with us.





Comments
David tennat was super. No one know what he will do next. He was a blast.
Matt smith is not bad because he is not that attractive with too much bald.
Making him best doctor is really not good for him. He has long way to go before even talking same level as david tennant.
But not only has Stephen Moffat (the writer of the best episodes since the 2005 revival as anyone will tell you) brought back the brilliance that makes this show what it is, but Matt Smith has been brilliant in the role of the Doctor to top off the excitement.
All I can say is thank god. I don't know if I would have been able to stomach any more of that endless cheesyness. I might even have stopped watching!
I think Dave Tennant was a tough act to follow.
I don't think I will watch Dr Who again while Matt Smith. I think currently it is like watching Back to the Future.
Tennant and then Tom has a lot of compertion David Tennant is just simply the best Dr ever
I am LOVING Smith so far, and though it's early, I would agree he's better than Tennant. I his combination of awe-struck child and eccentric, grumpy old man. Where I feel he wins out over Tennant is his ability to carry bad writing on the merits of his quirky character alone. Granted, he hasn't yet had RTD levels of bad to overcome, but there have been bits where I would have been rolling my eyes in a Tennant episode, but Smith keeps me engaged. (I also am an Eccleston fan and feel he had a similar talent for transcending bad writing). I hope the Tennant-lovers will come to appreciate Smith's take on the role as much as I do, and learn it's okay to love more than one doctor.
I think complaints of Moffat reusing his old ideas are premature. They were great ideas the first time out, and he's entitled to bring them out for a victory lap these first few episodes. They're great callbacks to some of the best Tennant episodes, and serve to tie the two eras together.
Matt is bloody brilliant so far. From a shallow viewpoint, as a female he wasn't instantly as attractive as the lush Mr Tennant but after seeing Mr Smith in action am finding him rather yummy and absolutely loving his take on the character. He's unpredictable and childlike and wise and just the right amount of bonkers. Fabulous.
I know that Smith is not everyone's cup of tea, but please, give it time. After Tom Baker's first few episodes, there were many that absolutely hated this 'loony'. There is something just so eccentric about Smith, which is what I loved about Tom Baker. Before now, I was feeling that my favourite Doctor was a dead heat between Baker and Tennant, but now I feel it's a 3 way tie between them and Smith, with all others being very far behind. Tennant is clearly the best actor of the 3 but was ruined by RTD's wish to turn the Doctor into some sort of God. Baker was ruined by crappy scripts and a habit of hamming it up, especially in his final years. But so far, Smith seems to be hindered by neither.
To those naysayers, I would encourage you to watch the last 15 minutes of The Eleventh Hour again - do it for yourself and your love of the show! Smith just shines magnificently.
"I am definitely a mad man in a box"
"Ok, what have you got for me this time"
"Should take them about 60 seconds... whooooh, there they are"
"Oooops!... Amy Pond, the girl who waited, you've waited long enough"
"Enough of the 'raggedy'..."
Confident, but not over the top; eccentric, but not barmy; fun, but not light-hearted.
I loved those final scenes so much that I must have watched them about 10 times and since doing so, haven't been able to keep my eyes of this man in every scene he's in.
I'd like to also point out that the comments here reek of fanboy(andgirl) ism. "Matt Smith sucks! Tennant is the best EVER!" sort of comments are disheartening to read, simply because this is supposed to be the most intelligent childrens show out there. We're five episodes in and we've seen plenty of range out of Smith, more-so than with Tennant's first five. So the reasoning simply isn't there, and I wouldn't be surprised if everyone was just peeved because Tennant was just prettier.
I hope they stay LONG.
This is my personal opinion: David might habe been mindblowingly awesome, but Matt is INCREDIBLE. It's like he's been born to play the part...
Completely agree with you, and this article. And honestly, some of the so-called adults can't even be bothered to capitalize - which frankly tells quite a lot about them.
Yes, David was a great actor - but RTD tried too hard to make the series more likable to non-Who fans. Was I the only one who found Rose utterly boring?
Matt Smith has a GREAT take on the Doctor, and I cannot wait to see what he does this season. Fingers crossed for 'Amy's Choice' this week!
Tennant's run was uneven -- he was great sometimes (usually Steven Moffat's eps...hmmmm), but most of the time I felt like I was watching a cartoon. RTD's writing really brought Tennant down -- just a bunch of running around until the big speech at the end about how amazingly wonderful and amazing the doctor is and somehow by the power of his amazingness he would solve everything and NOBODY DIES TODAY. When Moffat's doctor comes up with a solution, it actually makes sense, and is rooted in something the audience has already seen earlier in the episode.
I am LOVING Smith so far, and though it's early, I would agree he's better than Tennant. I his combination of awe-struck child and eccentric, grumpy old man. Where I feel he wins out over Tennant is his ability to carry bad writing on the merits of his quirky character alone. Granted, he hasn't yet had RTD levels of bad to overcome, but there have been bits where I would have been rolling my eyes in a Tennant episode, but Smith keeps me engaged. (I also am an Eccleston fan and feel he had a similar talent for transcending bad writing). I hope the Tennant-lovers will come to appreciate Smith's take on the role as much as I do, and learn it's okay to love more than one doctor.
I think complaints of Moffat reusing his old ideas are premature. They were great ideas the first time out, and he's entitled to bring them out for a victory lap these first few episodes. They're great callbacks to some of the best Tennant episodes, and serve to tie the two eras together.
I have watched Who since the Tom Baker era (and having gone back to Hartnell), I can honestly say that Matt Smith's portrayal so far is closer to what I have come to love in my favorite time lord. RTD while I applaud him from bringing back the series and fighting to make it popular had a tendency to write himself into a corner, and pulled the deus ex machina element far too often with little or no build up (eg last of the time lords, journey's end, end of time).
As for Rose I was not sad to see her go, while she was interesting in the beginning, the love sick puppy routine that she, and Martha were written into was ludicrous to the extreme and way overdone. I am happy to see that Moffat is starting to steer Smith away from this aspect that plagued the previous era.
But the relaity is the new generation of Whovians don't know the early Doctors, and often dismiss the classic episodes due to the low budget special effects.
Paul Magann was superbly cast as the Doctor in the Doctor Who movie and has been stellar in the Big Finish audio adventures- but the storyline of thetv movie had major flaws- (HALF HUMAN???)
I'd welcome a Doctor Who speciall about the Time War showing him regenerate into the 9th Doctor.
It was a treat seeing the meeting between the 10th and 5th Doctors.
I really like Eccleson's 9th Doctor-his incarnation was vulnerable, traumatized by the Time war and elusive- yet Tennant's 10th Doctor is unbeatable- He has the off putting arrogance of the 6th Doctor, yet the charm of the 3rd Doctor and the 2nd Doctor's tendency to wander into trouble..
So far, Matt Smith is doing a good job... Katy Manning will be reprising her role as companion Jo Grant for an appearance on 'The Sarah Jane Adventueres (the 11th doctor will also appear)-, I'd like to see Tom Baker return for an adventure with the 11th Doctor. Inserted cgi effects could easily disguise the fact Tom Baker has aged and gained weight.
Too much agonising, too much mooning, far too straight and utterly lacking in charm. I couldn't stand him. Almost everyone I know who liked DT either fancied him or hadn't not been a long term fan (or both usually).
Matt Smith has got off to a great start. He is quirky and funny and I have really enjoyed watching him. I have also been very taken with Amy Pond. Too sexy - no. Sexy - absolutely, she is delectable.
Christopher Eccleston's performance in this new generation of the Doctor I found quite interesting. He was full of energy and stark-mad, but between him and Matt Smith, I found DT quite inaccessible to those who weren't die-hard fans.
Truth be told, I couldn't *stand* David Tennant's Doctor Who at all. The level of cheese (the scripts he had to portray at least) brought to the screen left me wondering why the hell anyone would want to watch such dribble. The author is correct - he seemed invincible most of the time which takes away from ones ability to identify with him as a character.
Matt Smith however, was what I consider something of a diamond in the rough. When I first learned he would be the new doctor I was shocked. I thought, who is this emo looking Uni student they expect to play the doctor??.
I was very very wrong though. Not only did Matt Smith embrace what it meant to be the Doctor (we had almost long forgotten) but he does so in a way that makes you BELIEVE he could be real. I've never been so into the new generation of DW that I wouldn't miss a single episode, but for this season thats been the case. It's been amazing.
Suffice to say, I'll be buying this on Blu-ray when it comes out.
For those who think that Matt is a little bland, re-watch the old Doctor Who, forget DT and give the guy a chance. He will surprise you despite his appearance.
Matt Smith on the other hand is amazing! He has brought back the true meaning of the programme. People that slag him off obviously were watching the wrong programme...
I thought Chris Eccleston did a fantastic job in terms of re-establishing the show. When he left and David Tennant took over, I wasn't really enamoured with Tennant. It took about two series to win me over. By the time of David's third series, I thought he was really remarkable and definitely up there with Tom Baker. By the of the specials I knew I was going to miss him.
When it was announced that Matt Smith would take over as Doctor, I had my reservation as I did with every actor who took over in the lead role. What I found was I was a little uneasy with the first story and half way through the series, I found myself getting used to of Matt Smith and by the first series for Matt Smith, I really like his performance and I'm enjoying what he's bringing to the role.
As a viewer I cant wait for the next series and what Matt is given to work with storywise. Hopefully like all his predecessors, he'll get better with each passing performance and hopefully his popularity will continue to grow with the viewing public.
"I'm the Doctor and we're in the biggest library in the galaxy, look me up."
"I have defeated you time and time again, I have defeated you, I send you back into the void, I saved the hole of reality from you! I'm the Doctor and you are the Daleks!"
"HELLO STONEHENGE! WHO TAKES THE PANDORICA, TAKES THE UNIVERSE! BUT BAD NEWS EVERYONE! CAUSE GUESS WHO!? You're all whissing about, it's all very distracting, could you all stay still for a minute cause I AM TALKING! Now question for is whose got the Pandorica, answer; I do, next question, whose coming to take it from me? COME ON, LOOK AT ME! Look at me, no plan, no back-up, and I'll tell you something else I don't have, anything. to. loot!
So if you're sitting up there in your silly little spaceships with all your silly little guns and you got any plans on taking the Pandorica tonight... Just remember whose standing in your way! REMEMBER EVERY BLACK DAY I EVER STOPPED YOU! AND THEN! AAAND THEN! DO THE SMART THING! Let somebody else try first."
Now looking at the new series as standalone, would we be able to buy these speeches had it not been for RTD's seas
on finales and two parters and such? Heeell no.
This new Matt Smith is nothing more than fodder for a new, younger audience. Moffat is just being a puppet for the studio and giving them the cash cow they want by making Smith's Doctor as hip and cool as possible. I wouldn't be surprised if each episode started featuring songs from whatever artist is currently at the top of the charts.
And apparently sir, you've not read much Sherlock Holmes if you believe that Holmes never used anything other than his brain.
The others Im not naming are in the middle of the pack.
This new "young (un)cool guy in a cheap suit" Matt Smith is down at the bottom of the heap with Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy. After 1 episode I cant stand Matt Smith. Im not even willing to watch him in another episode - the one new episode I saw looked like a high school production.
Im sorry I wanted it to be good but I just dont think He will last. And even if he somehow does - I wont be watching this tripe.
When you read about Doctor Who or hear the name Doctor Who, TOM BAKER comes to mind. He’ll always be the Best All Time Doctor Who ever.
David Tennant was fun to watch I admit, though he was no Tom Baker nor did he act like Tom, not even close, and this is why I do understand where the article writer is coming from in regards to David and his style and attitude when playing Doctor Who.
Though I do truly have to agree that Matt Smith has some Tom Baker in him when he plays the character. Who knows, perhaps Matt will be 2nd to Tom Baker and re-fuel the Doctor Who franchise.
MATT, study all of Tom Baker’s Doctor Who episodes (1974 to 1981).
David Tennant was great though - an equal to the hitherto unsurpassed Tom Baker. But after several tears of Tenant him I'd had enough.
I took one look at Matt Smith and cringed. I braced myself for the worst, ready to tune out forever. But I was thrilled to find him taking the Doctor back to the original series and then building on that.
Smith's Doctor is a wonderfully effective mix of Troughton and Baker. There can be no higher praise.
And now that RTD's dreadful influence has been removed, the scripts and stories are already far better than anything we've seen since the early 80's
GO MATT UR DOING REALLY WELL!!!!!!!!!
Matt Smith is probably quirkier, but the three doctors I listed were better actors and at times, funnier. The Doctor's character is supposed to be a mix of all emotions and the actor who plays him should be able to change his emotion ON THE SPOT! That is one of the doctor's best traits, and I think that Matt Smith has a bit of trouble with that. He tries to be funny too hard, and the doctor is funny, but he isn't always and Matt Smith has a hard time seeing that.
Matt Smith is not THE Doctor, neither is David Tennant, Peter Davidson, or Tom Baker. There is no DOCTOR. They all do their job well, some better then others and some worse such as Sylvester McCoy, but there isn't supposed to be one major doctor. That is ruining the whole point of Doctor Who. If the producers wanted that, they would've made him immortal rather then able to regenerate. So keep this in mind, before you judge the Actors who play the Doctor. ;)
My wife watched episodes of this season, shrugging off RTD's seasons as too Saturday morning cartoonish. She teared up during the Van Gogh episode.
Matt Smith does a great job, to me. I think Moffat should get at least as much credit though.
I like Smith because he does the role very much like a classical doctor.
Another thing I really disliked with Tennant is how gimmicky he made the Sonic Screwdriver. That thing is bad writing incarnate. In the beginning (the Tom Baker days) it was little more then a screwdriver that could tamper with electronics, but Tennant took it and turned it into a magic wand with powers that would make J.K. Rowling blush.
I go back to John Pertwee days as my first Dr,and managed to get Tom Bakers autograph once,but I don't care for nostalgia.Watching back some old episodes I was quite surprised at how basic it all was.
Tennant was an amazing actor and brought power to the role but the scripts made him out to be messianic and he was far too human for my liking. What he was didn't feel like the Doctor of old for many of the wrong reasons. He was too brilliant, too capable and too powerful where Doctors in the past, whilst taking advantage of their status as a very witty and competent super-alien had very clear flaws.
Hartnel's Doctor had a Puckish sense of disregard for those around him and was driven only by his own curiosity and want to hide from the Time-Lords.
Troughton's Doctor was frequently frivolous and overly eccentric, damaged by his first regenreation.
Pertwee's Doctor was introspective, self-involved and egotistical like a brilliant but spoiled child, set amongst people he perceived to be his lessers.
Baker's Doctor was vain and emotionally unstable, looking to take back his lost time stuck on Earth and stick a middle finger up at his own people.
Davidson's Doctor was nervous and introspective, suddenly very conscious of the world around him and his responsibility to it more than he ever had been in the past and this made him hesitant and distant.
Colin Baker's Doctor was brash and aggressive, almost as if he felt his past potential had been wasted and he had to put that to rights by proving himself in the eyes of everybody else.
Mccoy's Doctor was tortured, taking his responsibility and grimly pushing on to do what he felt had to be done at any cost, even if this meant his own death or that of someone close to him. He felt the weight of the universe on his shoulders and this made him mercurial and prone to mood swings.
Mcgann's Doctor was seemingly an attempt to return to innocence, to try to explore the universe with the free will and fervour for life he had once had to the point of being juvenile and reckless.
Eccleston's Doctor was psychologically scarred by the Time War making him unpredictable and morose, simply looking for someone who could share his impossible burden.
These little quirks made the Doctor a complex and interesting character rather than an alien Santa-Christ. More, they made him alien to us. The Doctor was, as one former writer put it, 'a far-off mountain range', beautiful but dangerous and intimidating and impossible to put in to perspective. Russel T Davies seemed to just want to put his own tired pop-culture philosophies in to the mouth of an action-hero and as brilliant and passionate as Tennant was this made him rather overexposed.
I also have to agree that the Rose love story was tired and rather insulted all the previous wonderful people the Doctor had travelled with by downgrading them. I don't dislike the idea that the Doctor after the trauma of the Time War needed someone to reach out to but it could have been handled SO much better.
Smith isn't perfect, he has yet to find his feet with the role but Tennant took at least a season and a half to get over his spastic, nervous performances so I'm more than happy to give him the time to grow, thus far he's been a real return to the fundamental things that made the Doctor great.
I started watching Doctor Who in 2009, but have seen all episodes, for me David Tennant has been the best for me, because he added life into the doctor, he was funny and was more brainy, Christopher Eccleston for me made Doctor Who too common! Series 5 for me, wasn't very good, the daleks were ruined tbh, weeping angels just aint scary any-more, but i like the idea that Steven Moffat is trying to make the Cybermen sound more dangerous, because when they faced the daleks they got destroyed. Now for Matt Smith, Doctor Who is in the middle of 2 other programs, Sarah Jane Adventures which is aimed at children, Torchwood is aimed at young adults and higher, the Doctor Who is trying to aim for every type of audience, but Matt Smith has made it more childish, then Amy Pond wants to kiss the doctor, trying to make it more adult aimed, which is confusing.
The mystery behind River Song is brilliant, after the episodes with her in, it makes you want to know more, and its buggering me, for who she really is! Rory, is just stupid, get rid off him!
Matt Smith has to work hard, since RTD left, Doctor Who has complete changed, everyone has been forgotten, Jack Harness, Rose, Martha, Donna, all gone! Its like Doctor Who went for another 16 years, then came back, too much changed too quickly! SM is a great writer!
I did watch some of series 5 and that's why I can say Mat Smith is perfect as the doctor.. but I just can't enjoy it the way I used to when it feels like a completely new show. So for that I can't stand Steven Moffat but Matt Smith himself... I hope he goes down as an amazing doctor just like David Tennant, Tom Baker etc.
Matt Smith, however, is the perfect blend of eccentric intelligence, wit, and warmth that I've been waiting for. His wardrob is spot-on, just the kind of thing I'd expect from the Doctor. While there are still lots of plot holes this season, overall it feels WAY more like Doctor Who that the first four seasons of the revival. I can actually watch now without wanting to vomit every five minutes!
In order, David Tennant is my favourite, with Christopher Eccleston, Tom Baker and John Pertwee tied for second.
As for Eccleston, what the writer of this article fails to remember is that he is portraying a Doctor fairly fresh from the Time War, a war that he had to end by locking away his own people. He has been eaten away by guilt, so it's appropriate that he is the way he was portrayed.
David Tennant took over as a man getting better with Rose's help, and I enjoyed the love story between them (the only thing I didn't like was her treatment of Mickey). I didn't like Martha Jones...too whiney). I LOVED the comic chemistry between Tennant and Tate...they were hilarious together.
So no, Matt Smith is definitely NOT the best Doctor. Too flaky IMO.
If you just watch the Craig Ferguson Late Late Show, you'll notice that every 5 minutes of Craig Ferguson acting is just like David Tennant acting as the Doctor. You could EASILY replace tennant with any old Brit just hamming it up, and it woudl be the same thing.
And RTD Magic? PLEASE! He could never figure out how to resolve even one damn episode. 95% of the episodes the bad guy was defeated purely by luck. Never by the doctor being smart, or brilliant, just by some idiot doing something on accident. Episode where he brought Sarah Jane back, the bad guy was defeated by some poor kid accidentally triggering a fire alarm. That's not Doctor Who, it's closer to freaking PInk Panther than anything.
I have respect for Tennant because he was a fan of the show. But He was nothing but a lothario built to make the women hem and haw in awe of him. Christopher Eccleston did a better job of it. And now Steven Moffat has to do Doctor Who on a SMALLER budget than RTD ever had, and he's doing a damn fine job of it may I add.
Seriously, RTD the best thing for Doctor Who ever my ass.
Matt Smith is simply fantastic as the Eleventh Doctor and pisses all over Tennant.
Christopher Eccleston should have did more than one series that is what I can say about that, sometimes blocking out the RTD era is the way to go about it.
Oh and please please get rid of flowerpot Daleks. Don't mind the tardis changing but Daleks looking like upturned pots???
Don't mind Amy but whats with that Rory.
He was too concerned with Rose and I hate how much that put down all the past companions, who (save a few) I don't even know. And didn't he have a wife or something at one point? What about her? He's lost his entire race, his family, almost everyone who mattered to him in the last NINE HUNDRED years, but Ten seems more concerned about this nineteen year old travelling with him. Instead of a companion being created for the Doctor, I feel like Ten was created for Rose and that really bothers me. I mean absolutely no disrespect - I love the relationships between the Doctor and the companions and I love shipping as much as the next fangirl, but Doctor Who isn't meant to be some sort of romantic soap opera. I would have much rather Ten/Rose be played down and there be more focus on the adventures.
I really like how Moffat is able to balance the Doctor/Companion aspect without pushing the romance too far (after how RTD set up the show, it's hard do a completely platonic relationship) while still focusing on the stories and the Doctor himself. Frankly, I have little respect for so-called Doctor Who fans who quit the show, because they don't like that David Tennant left. And I have absolutely no respect for fans who won't even give Matt Smith a shot. I've heard of plenty of people who didn't like David Tennant at first, because they were attached to Nine. But they continued to watch and Ten grew on them. Matt Smith has only been around for a season; he still has so much room left to grow.
Give him time. Despite the big shoes he has to follow (constantly being compared to Tennant and Baker), he has done wonderfully. I cannot wait to see what Moffat and Smith have in store now that the Eleventh Doctor has been more established.
I was thinking last night. That 1. The Russle / Tenant mix and all the other cast was excellent the most exciting, interesting thing I have seen in a long time. The Scrips, the retro affects the whole thing was A treat to the sences. I agree Matt has a long way to go. It;s not because he is young. A dr who should feel right straight away but not in this case. I think and have thought that Russle seemed to go for a more working class case , even tenant was classless which is good. Matt is a bit oxfordish that implies to me and others slightly biseuxal a bit of a rebel maybe arrogant. In fact Moffat appeared to go for actors that are more middle class see Blink and The Libary. What yo get with a more middle class vibe as in now Moffat ,Pond, Who is a posh version of Dr who and this does not work. Dr who was always about street level mums, dads, ordinary but amazing lives. The bland interaction of pond and who is almost unwatchable and one feels driven to watch to support them but knows it's not working in a brilliant manner. I feel as creative person myself that the only way to save this is as follows..
1. Mat has a musicians vibe almost like a singer. So use Pop art, use popular bangs music in the back ground make the show like a Pop music style cool format draw out the art in Matt which I think is there. Give it a retro 60s feel with Black and white two tone clothes and a lot of style. Have guest bands involved. I think this wouls suite Matt.
The problem is no one seems to have built with show around Dr who who is now matt. He is the biggest and most important part. I can understand that one did not wish for the show to crash like in the 80s. But Matt needs some styling some thought, some props to site his musical vibe; so bring in music. I also think that he should have a male person travelling with him , again thats the vibe I feel from him. If that is seen as gay or bisexal surely a time travller is going to understand all of life and experiement now and then as people often and will do. It would give Matt a sex appeal which is waiting to happen but blocked by pond not because pond is a girl because they are dull and unsuited as actors. Donna Noble ( one of the fav members would have been great) or one of russles dish washing actors full of hart, fun and compassion.
Quoting John Harper:
I was thinking last night. That 1. The Russle / Tenant mix and all the other cast was excellent the most exciting, interesting thing I have seen in a long time. The Scrips, the retro affects the whole thing was A treat to the sences. I agree Matt has a long way to go. It;s not because he is young. A dr who should feel right straight away but not in this case. I think and have thought that Russle seemed to go for a more working class case , even tenant was classless which is good. Matt is a bit oxfordish that implies to me and others slightly biseuxal a bit of a rebel maybe arrogant. In fact Moffat appeared to go for actors that are more middle class see Blink and The Libary. What yo get with a more middle class vibe as in now Moffat ,Pond, Who is a posh version of Dr who and this does not work. Dr who was always about street level mums, dads, ordinary but amazing lives. The bland interaction of pond and who is almost unwatchable and one feels driven to watch to support them but knows it's not working in a brilliant manner. I feel as creative person myself that the only way to save this is as follows..
1. Mat has a musicians vibe almost like a singer. So use Pop art, use popular bangs music in the back ground make the show like a Pop music style cool format draw out the art in Matt which I think is there. Give it a retro 60s feel with Black and white two tone clothes and a lot of style. Have guest bands involved. I think this wouls suite Matt.
The problem is no one seems to have built with show around Dr who who is now matt. He is the biggest and most important part. I can understand that one did not wish for the show to crash like in the 80s. But Matt needs some styling some thought, some props to site his musical vibe; so bring in music. I also think that he should have a male person travelling with him , again thats the vibe I feel from him. If that is seen as gay or bisexal surely a time travller is going to understand all of life and experiement now and then as people often and will do. It would give Matt a sex appeal which is waiting to happen but blocked by pond not because pond is a girl because they are dull and unsuited as actors. Donna Noble ( one of the fav members would have been great) or one of russles dish washing actors full of hart, fun and compassion.
Karen Gillian is absolutely brilliant though.
No one is more or less the doctor because of the writing or the interpretation of character and to suggest that Matt is more or less 'doctor-like' isn't very fair. Every doctor that has graced our screens thus far is undoubtedly the doctor, no one is more or less so, and to suggest this is completely preposterous, not to mention non-sensical. Wake up people, the point is that he regenerates, he changes, and he retains, and loses some of the aspects of his old personality, as well as picking up new facets. If he were to always be a dashing, dramatic hero, the show would loose its value, BUT the same can be said if he were to always be geeky and have more of an old mans personality.
I would also like to point out that, as true fans of the show, and I am happy to see that there are many of these people in the comments above, we ought to be happy with the transience of the show. Why should we fight that it is accessible to too many people, or else too little. Quite honestly, whether or not you liked Rose as a character, as is a very heated topic above, does not dictate you value, or dedication to the fandom. Yes, I realise we are all allowed to have our favourite companions, but why bother discrediting one, or else a writer, or a specific doctor, when they are all part of the same collective. I think we should be happy that we have new doctor who, and yes, we can most definitely be grateful to RTD for that. I think we can be happy for the emotional depth and alien nature that DT and MS brought to the roles respectively. There is definitely a line to be drawn between ‘having an opinion’ and unnecessary bashing.
People based Peter very quickly, as soon as he became the Doctor, after replacing Tom after he was the 4th Doctor for seven years... it seems to be happening to Matt too. I don't know why fans have to be so critical.. I thought his first season was great.... especially the Eleventh Hour when you get to see glimpses of the old Doctors! Wonderful! I am hoping people will warm up to Matt instead of obsessing over Tennant. That era is gone, move on and try to give some happy thoughts to Matt.... it isn't the easiest job in the world you know. And I think thats one of the reasons they won't get another actor like Hartnell to play the role... it's a very rough job.
I do not like lazy storytelling, of which Davies was a chronic offender. Moffat, on the other hand, while not perfect, at least knows how to pace a script and tie up loose ends rather than just have everything turn into a mad run-around padded with tedious angst and an often rather nonsensical ending.
As for Matt Smith, better than Tom Baker, really? Tom Baker took the role and made it his own, x10. Even people who find T. Baker not to their liking have to admit he did not follow the beaten path. He clearly got a bit bored in the last bit of his tenure, but during the height of his run, you could believe he was centuries-old and from another world.
Matt Smith is good as the Doctor, but he is still clearly growing into the role, IMHO - the character does not seem fully gelled to me. He has a lot of potential, though. Give him another series or two and then we'll see what he does...
I also don't particularly care for how he dresses like a 70 year old literature professor with too-tight pants. It seems goofy, and not in a good way. It makes him seem even immature. Like a child dressing up in his dad's boots to seem older.
By comparison, I didn't think I would like 10, but after only an episode, I was sold. I agree with this article that the soapy-ness of Rose brought Tennant's Doctor down. Even as somebody who's never watched any of the original, I knew the Doctor had many previous companions, and I it seemed absurd that he would have such an attachment to Rose, who seem seem that special and who I didn't particularly like as a character. But Tennant was good enough to overcome my annoyance with that, and I LOVED mostly Rose-free season 3. I couldn't wait to see more. I watched Tennant's entire run in less than a week.
Judging by these comments, it doesn't seem that Matt Smith's Doctor will improve much. Maybe I'll skip ahead to a later episode and see if I like it any better. If not, I'll just wait for a new Doctor.
But i think that what's really smashed up the series is Stephen Moffat's writing, when he did the one off episode a series for tennant the scripts were superb and i loved every minute of the episodes, especially blink and the empty child, that one freaked me out. But now he seems to have dumbed it way down, it's become a childrens show and thats not what it is.
Also for you people out there who say that tennant isn't 'alien' enough and thats what matt brings to the part. how can you say that when we all have a completely different opinion on how an alien would act. In fact any of you how say that matt is THE DOCTOR is also wrong, each actor brings a different bit of personality to the part and shouldn't be influenced by previous doctors because they are their own characters.
I'll just end with saying that people should stop bashing each other over who they like, Tennant fans aren't all girls and the new series isn't that bad. But i am biased as i'm a Tennant fan all the way. I just wished that the stories and scripts would live up to their old brilliant standards. Moffat lost me when he had Smith spitting out food, i only carried on to see how the companions and the Doctor developed. I do wish Tennant was back though!!!!!!
I went back to episode 3. Amy starts to come alive after about episode 5, but the Doctor takes all the way through episode 11 to really pick it up. In those last 3 episodes, he shows a lot of potential. The plots are good enough to sustain his lacking performance, and Amy becomes a lot more likable once (very slight spoiler) it's apparent she'll treat her boyfriend a lot better than Rose did.
My dislike of Rose was always from her appalling treatment of Mickey, which always made me wonder why the Doctor supposedly had feelings for someone who showed such little integrity in her personal relationships. (That, and I didn't think they had much chemistry.) The whole thing seemed very immature for someone who was supposed to be over 900 years old. It's refreshing not to have to suffer through that kind of thing again with the eleventh Doctor.
I still think David Tennant did a better job in that he hit the ground running and was the strongest part of the show. He also made the appalling romance aspect tollerable. Matt Smith seems to be the weakest part of his show. He's fortunate enough to have been given a better story to work with. His storylines and performance also aren't hidered by trying to make the character still seem ancient, wordly and wise while trying to pull of a relationship which is anything but.
Matt Smith has potential though.
Matt Smith is likely a lovely young man but he does not carry the weight of a thosands of year old time lord. He's a soso actor and he really doesn't lend a single thing to the character to make it worth watching after all these years.
I watched faithfully and anxiously up to the last series. I gave up about half way through, tried to watch the finale and gave up on that as well.
I think I'm done with the Doctor until someone less lost in the past takes the helm once again. And I loved Moff's stuff until he took over as show runner. Now I can't wait for him to move on.
David Tennant was often good, but frequently just goofy. "Look how wacky I can act!"
Christopher Eccleston is the "modern" #1.
Tom Baker is the "classic" #1.
and i know some people are still pissed off that david left but people let it go matt is the better doctor hands down
anyway, thanks for making an afternoon of aimlessness a pleasant one. :)
I loved Tennant, and always will (and adored Ten). But I was also thoroughly impressed with Eleven. Matt Smith is wonderful -- strange, funny, genuinely odd.
But what I'm NOT thrilled about is SM as showrunner. Season 5 was incredibly uneven and so many times seemed to rely on Amy saving the day, or worst, magical revelations out of nowhere. Last season's Beast Below episode with the 'star whale' was one of the worst, most embarrassing things I've ever seen on TV, yet the Vincent and the Doctor episode, meanwhile, was one of the best (so that gave me hope).
However, the Big Plot last season was sloppily written, with a lot of gaping logic holes that just don't hang together. And for all the complaints about RTD's 'deus ex machina' tendencies, having Amy simply 'wish' the Doctor back into existence was laughable. (At least when the world does it at the end of S3, there's some logic and science behind it.)
I thought Moffatt had written some of the loveliest eps of NewWho ever before taking over, and was excited at what he would do. But he's so heavyhanded and clunky. He seemed to go out of his way to change EVERYTHING and try to make it cooler. Cooler TARDIS. Cooler wardrobe. The Doctor is constantly talking about 'cool.' It's just weird. (And for all the talk about Ten's arrogance, Eleven is CONSTANTLY spouting speeches about his own awesomeness and magnificence. Smith is adorable enough I almost don't care, but still...) Meanwhile for all the criticism of Rose/Doctor, to me it was mostly in the subtext, in the background, and very moving to me. Contrast that with Amy, who is constantly flirting with the Doctor (even after her marriage), and whose entire relationship with Rory (whom I adore) seems to be based on treating the poor guy like dirt while reminding him the Doctor is always (possibly) her first real choice. It's just referred to so often and so blatantly (whether for laughs or not), while the Rose/Doc thing was so subtle people weren't even sure there was a romance there at all.
Anyway. And Moffat also seems really sloppy -- he'd much rather jump-cut or cheat a story than actually simply tell it. So this DW doesn't feel like SciFi, but fantasy, and worst of all he is incredibly lazy with continuity. In last year's season as well as the first few eps of this one, he has shown himself totally willing to retcon or spin moments even from his own previous works! So he changes the way the Angels work (from his own previous episode!), he makes the Doctor gleefully genocidal, he has Amy (who is still a total cipher to me) constantly obsessed with wife/motherhood, and worst of all for me, he changes the River Song/Doctor dynamic into a direct ripoff of "Time Traveler's Wife" (a book I hated), in which suddenly we're now told that she's seeing him backwards and he's going forwards (before it was clearly stated that the meetings were jumping around, which was why the need for the journals). So he resorted to a cheap plot device just to add some pathos to the situation -- which it didn't need.
I love River Song, I love Eleven. I just don't love what DM is doing to the show. I'm hanging in there -- I'm still enjoying it -- but it's like I have to do so without thinking too hard now (why the silly faked deaths in the S6 Silents two-parter? Why have River jump -- AGAIN? Why can Rory remember being a Nestene when he is only a reset human version of himself? etc.). If I think too much about the story, as with S5, it all falls apart, and that's sad, considering this show used to make me think like no other.
I still miss Tennant's ferocity and wit, and it broke my heart when he left. But I love Smith too. I don't hate Moffat -- I never could, not after "Silence in the Library" or "Blink." But I don't think he's doing his best work yet. And I can't help but wonder if maybe he needed RTD to really write at his best. So far his tenure as showrunner has been really disappointing. But fingers crossed it gets better. I still love the show, flaws and all.
Without a doubt, Tennant was a brilliant Doctor, and we came to love him quickly for his quick mind, his brilliant quips, his torn personality, and so much more. And after 4 years in the role, many Who fans weren't ready to let him go, forgetting that while the Doctor will always live on, each incarnation's song must eventually end. And so, bitter at the loss of there beloved 10th Doctor, many people refuse to see the truth of the shining star that took his place.
The truth is, from the moment he popped his head out of the TARDIS in the Eleventh Hour, asking for an apple, Matt Smith owned the role more quickly and more completely than any Doctor before him. At once so young and so ancient, he displays the wisdom of the very first Doctor, the mad-cap eccentricity of Tom Baker's Doctor, and Tennant's manic personality. He has something of the melancholy and bitterness that plagued Eccleston's Doctor as well (and to a large degree, Tennant's as well), but he has begun to learn from the hurts of the Time War, and he springs into everything with the exuberance of a man who has spent two lives on bitterness and is now reawakening to the splendors of the Universe.
His genius is overwhelming, to that point that thoughts spew from his mind and his lips faster than even he can follow, and he is in control of every situation the moment he arrives on the scene. He doesn't come off as overtly threatening because he has no need to, he has seen the ends of the universe, fought Daleks and Cybermen and other Time Lords, brought down mighty civilizations, and his name and stories are spoken in the farthest reaches of time and space, the Lonely God, and so his soft-spoken words are enough to strike fear in the hearts of even the bravest. Yes, people can say that Matt Smith is too young, or boring, or a poor actor, or that he doesn't live up to the role, but, frankly, they'd be blind to do so.